//
Blog Archives
Robbie Handcock – OnlyFans

OnlyFans
Robbie Handcock
with publication by Simon Gennard (download PDF here)
August 14-24

For OnlyFans, Robbie Handcock draws upon an ever-evolving archive of amateur pornography to develop a queer visual language in painting. Domestic in scale, Handcock’s works situate queerness as at once a matter of sexual desire and gendered performance, and an orientation towards decoration and ornamentation, transmitted through gossip, hearsay and tacky objects of visual culture. Rendered with haste and flippancy, refusing mastery and refinement, Handcock proposes painting as an erotic practise, able to make contact with moments of sexual possibility in the past, and imagine altered forms of intimacy in the future.

Accompanying the exhibition is a publication produced by Simon Gennard, titled Hatefucking. Taking visual cues from queer liberation magazines from the 1970s and 80s, Hatefucking traverses the author’s personal sexual misadventures as well as the political history of queer activism in Aotearoa, arguing for sex as a profoundly ambivalent force–capable of animating a desire for a more just future, and liable to be swept up in an anaemic liberal logic of inclusion.
OnlyFans and its accompanying publication have been made possible with the generous support of the Emerging Artists Trust and RM.

BENTLEY / MCNEIL / WALTON / I Lean You My Support

24th July- 10 August
Opening 6pm 24th July

“There is nothing inherently unusual about the notion of not working while at work; people commonly look at Facebook on their phones or seek other distractions during work hours… “[But] appearing as if you’re doing nothing is seen as a threat to the general working order of the company”” (How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy, Jenny Odell).

I Lean You My Support is a group show by three artists that engages with the idea of teamwork in business environments: sharing ideas, problem solving and working together.
Floorsheet PDF – download here

Virginia Were 
Working Together Can Lead to a Miraculous 
Outcome

A Review of I Lean You My Support
Download PDF here

Ardit Hoxha – Solidaritet/Solidarity

Solidaritet/Solidarity
3rd – 20th July
Ardit Hoxha

Solidaritet/Solidarity takes its name from a former social housing complex in Kosovo, where Ardit Hoxha and his family resided in the late 1990s. Displaced by the ethnic cleansing that characterised the collapse of Yugoslavia and its subsequent wars, Hoxha now revists this site, its contradictions and its utopian visions, constructing a narrative of red nostalgia. 
The show is accompanied by a publication including the written work of Vanessa Cole and Ardit Hoxha. Designed by Bardhi Haliti. 
Made possible by the generous support of Creative New Zealand and RM Gallery

Amy Unkovich – Gathered Vernacular

12-29 June 2019
Amy Unkovich is an Auckland based artist. She works primarily with materials associated with construction and renovation. Amy makes architectonic sculptural installations that use colour and tactility to play with notions of interior treatments and architectural tropes.

Mark Schroder – GOLDKORP

GOLDKORP
22 May – 7 June
Mark Schroder

WE HAVE REVIEWED THE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROLS OPERATED BY THE RELEVANT DEPARTMENT OF THE COMPANY AND CARRIED OUT SUCH TESTS AS WE HAVE CONSIDERED NECESSARY. FROM OUR EXAMINATIONS WE ARE OF THE OPINION THAT THE RELEVANT DEPARTMENT OF THE COMPANY HAS PROPERLY MAINTAINED THE BALANCE FOR THE MONTH OF [DATE].

GOLDKORP repurposes RM as head office of a confident and seemingly sophisticated gold holdings company.

What could possibly go wrong?
Don’t miss out.
Invest today!

Mark Schroder creates amalgam-installations of aspiration and disappointment. Recent projects include: it’s only a scratch, play_station, Wellington, 2018 and NEW GOLD MOUNTAIN, Blue Oyster Art Project Space, Dunedin, 2018.

Photos by Sam Hartnett.

Nicholete Brocchi – It’s not a move it is a Transition

17th April – 11th May

It’s not a move it is a Transition investigates the privatization of correctional facilities in Aotearoa. Working from a removed position the exhibition draws on the connections to the justice system in Australia, and the relation homelessness and drug addiction have to incarceration.

The ongoing project is concerned with how current legal systems reduce a person to a set of criminal actions, individualizing and moralizing systemic issues. This process fails to take into consideration the heightened and targeted rates of incarceration amongst marginalized members of the community. It’s not a move it is a Transition reverses the process of current legal systems onto the viewer, asking them to take a position on the conditions of correctional facilities in Aotearoa.

Accompanying essay by Just Speak

Emerita Baik – I love more than two loves

I love more than two loves
Emerita Baik

27th March – 13 April

I Love More Than Two Loves is a solo exhibition by Emerita Baik. The tactile sculptures manifest the intangible experiences of people living with a language barrier. Baik explores traditional Korean quilting technique, Nubi as well as western quilting techniques to articulate the hybridisation of cultures. Within this, fabrics drawn from the everyday, such as bedsheets, shower curtains, blankets are juxtaposed with traditional Korean fabric, Ramie. The mark making on the surface responds to experiences of estrangement, challenging the familiar perceptions of the everyday through materiality.

Generously sponsored by The Fabric Store, Wellington.

Image credit: Hendrix Watson

Jill Sorensen

From November 5, 2018, Jill will be the RM Archive resident.

Rm Conversation Pit

Over the next twelve weeks Rm Archive will host Rm Conversation Pit, a series of habitable installations and amicable talking events. Adopting the impromptu format of a happening and the architectural intent of a conversation pit, each Rm Conversation Pit will bring together a small group of people and a provocation on re-thinking nature-culture through which to engender speculative freeform discussion. Conversation Pit invites participants to share in a dynamic of thinking-together, a process articulated by object-oriented ontology philosopher Timothy Morton as “a physical process that happens in-between people and in interactions with people”[*] For each conversation a conversation pit (or nook, cranny, hut or den)  will be constructed in the Archive room, an evocative dwelling-space in which to incubate small moments of re-thinking-together and hopefully seeding ongoing thinking and sharing.

A common thread that may be traced through discourse surrounding the changed state of our planet, often referred to as the ‘Anthropocene’,[†] is the urgent role of active imagination in making the transition from an anthropocentric stance to the yet un-named identify-value arrangement we are, literally, dreaming up for ourselves. This project directly engages contemporary art practice as a modality for this imaginative passage from disempowered, passive consumption in the Holocene to the active caring required in the Anthropocene. These conversations set out to catalyse moments of active engagement in which we might ponder together the implications of this re-imagined being. To speculate on how we might act and interact now that we find that we are human, and not our anthropocentric alter-ego Human. These concerns may be addressed in many ways and via various terminology; Rm Conversation Pit sets out to hold space for all voices as we talk our way into small steps of reimaging the here and now of dwelling together.

You are invited to enlist in a conversation or conversations of your choosing, please respond to info@rm.org.nz with your name and availability within the allocated time-frame. Conversations will be convened in groups of 3-5 participants and will be two hours in duration. Unless otherwise arranged they will be 6-8pm weekdays and 4-6 pm weekends.

Rm Conversation Pit Part 2

22 – 27 February 2019

For the duration of this event Rm Archive has been transformed into a conversation pit, a relaxed summer space for talking and sipping a cool beverage. Conversations will happen daily and can be arranged to suit. Suggested times are Lunch time (lunch provided), after work or weekend afternoon (for a cool cocktail) at 5.30pm, or evening (for a wine and snacks) 7.30pm. If you would like to be part of this talk-fest please contact us on info@rm.org with you name, contact details and preferred time(s) and date(s).

The environmental crisis has toppled our self-appointed Western position as masters of the Natural World. A so-called Natural Order in which, subservient only to God and Angels, it was proper for Humans to (in descending order and variable over time), admire (whales, dolphins) nurture as companions (dogs, horses, cats) raise to eat (sheep, cows, pigs, chickens) kill as vermin (rats, stoats, possums) plunder to eat (fish, sea food, ‘game’ animals and birds) grow to eat (fruits, vegetables, nuts) cultivate to host the above (soil, land) build on, mine, drain (land) throw unwanted material items into as ‘waste’ (land, sea, atmosphere) As this hierarchy collapses around us we are beset with questions of how we should now live. Rm Conversation Pit Part 2 invites you to think-together on two of these questions

what, or who, should we eat?

The above ‘Western position’ expects urban and suburban dwellers to be passive consumers, how might we reclaim roles of active participation?

I am hungry, I have teeth, what can I eat?

In a post-Holocene Earth eating becomes strategic, what can I eat if I care? What can we eat and survive as a biosphere? How can I eat and not participate in resource hungry Capitalist consumption?

In this charnel ground we are preparing for ourselves, this polluted, denuded and climate changed earth what is there for a person to eat?

Not a passive consumer

Under the banner of Modernism urban and suburban dwelling evolved as a passive transition point between a flow of resources from a generalised and abundant ‘somewhere’ and an unseen and endless ‘away’. If we now accept that nature is not that thing over yonder, existing perfectly in wilderness and imperfectly in farmland, but rather is an immersive biosphere in which all participate how then should we live?

Could we, should we and how might we transition from site of passive consumption toward a role active participation in a cyclic domestic hub?

What happens to the category of things we now term ‘waste’ garbage’ or ‘rubbish’ now we know there is no away? How might we live with nonhuman others now that we are not at the top of an anthropocentric hierarchy?

In Rm Conversation Pit Part 2 Rm Archive resident Jill Sorensen invites you to take part in a meandering, amicable conversation about urban dwelling and ecology. While Rm Conversation Pit Part 1 engaged with academic discourse, Part 2 of the project aims to draw on every-day knowledges, DIY ideas, and personal opinion.

—————————————————————————————————————
Conversation #1

Thursday 22 November­­, 6 – 8pm
Tuesday 27 November, 6 – 8pm
+ Drop in Saturday – informal meeting and talking space with the artist
1-3pm Saturday 24 November

Sharing in an intimate world: Rethinking human vs nature

sharing in an intimate world acknowledges the impossibility of maintaining an anthropocentric worldview[‡] in an era of eco-crisis and invites us to tease out ways to orient ourselves within a biosphere in which we are continuous with the network of entities we previously called nature.

This re-imagined world-view has been described as the third-place (Bruno Latour) or in the words of Timothy Morton, an experience of intimacy and closeness with nonhuman entities, which may include the bacteria in our bodies, the biota, animals and plants with whom we cohabit, but also trash; the plastic, chemical and biological waste we have carelessly spread around and are now intimately surrounded by.

I would like to draw attention to the semantic origins of the term intimacy, a noun deriving from the Latin root intimus, meaning innermost, most personal, profound. If we put aside the anthropocentric usage of intimacy as referring solely to close and/or sexual relations between humans, we may find the original meaning instructional for addressing this unexpected encroachment of nonhumans into physical and psychological human space. When intimacy is extended to include nonhumans, it appears less comfortable, indicating a close, family-like connection between disparate entities. Close, as in next to your skin and embedded in your thinking, and family-like as in inherited, an inescapable birth-right.


Conversation #2

Monday 3 December, 6 – 8pm
Tuesday 4 December, 6 – 8pm
+ Drop in Saturday – informal meeting and talking space with the artist
1-3pm Saturday 1 November

The Agency of Things

Water, soil, rock, a tree, a chicken, a cat, some wheat, some excrement, a plastic bottle, a river. Our relationships with these things may be articulated as resources and waste that we need to manage but also as entities with whom our lives are intertwined. Both statements extort us to act responsibly toward these things, however the dynamic at stake in each is significantly different. In the first and more familiar statement, we adopt the position of guardian and primary actor in an active/passive relationship. In contrast to this, the second statement reflects emerging thinking and language elicited by the realisation that human activity has irreversibly changed the planet. It suggests a recalibration of human identity to a less anthropocentric role in which we interact with the autonomous agency of other entities, of things.

Our language, the vehicle of our thinking, falters here; It is telling that the word ‘thing’ appears to fill a gap in English language, operating as a proxy-term that stands in for those ‘objects’ and ‘materials’ we are not quite able to imagine as entities, beings or persons. We can acknowledge effects of things (carbon becomes coal, becomes carbon dioxide and energy, a cow eats, farts and produces carbon dioxide and milk), but we baulk at ascribing things agency as such. While we can scientifically imagine a timeframe in which we can apprehend their action we fail to philosophically imagine this more-than-human scale activity as a mode of being.


Conversation #3

Tues 11 December, 6-8pm
Tues 18 December, 6-8pm

Between elsewhere and away: reimagining the suburban/urban home

The big wake-up call of the environmental crisis is the reminder that we are not separate from nature, Earth is not an infinite resource for our progress, and there is no away. Urban dwelling emerged from a culture in which we imagined our human selves as cradled between infinite earthly resource and a mythical ‘away’. Home became normalised as a house and garden, a two-part structure demarking an inside for human dwelling and an outside for all other entities. The permeability of the house is strictly monitored; there are clearly defined orifices for the entry of entities, energies, goods and resources. There are equally well-defined orifices for departure; the multifunction entry/exit for inhabitants (human, companion and machine) are supplemented by multiple exits to ‘away’ for entities no longer required, which exit discreetly as ‘waste’.

Like all mammals, we are made up of a plethora of entities; bacteria, microorganisms, viruses and inherited DNA. Like all mammals we are permeable; food, water, oxygen, oils and chemicals move continually between our environments and our bodies. Unlike other mammals we dwell extravagantly, co-opting soil, water, building materials, solar energy, wind, air CO2, oxygen, biota, plants, animals (as pets, food or pests), consumer goods and fossil fuels to use and discard. However, despite sectioning ourselves off into a human enclave, I suggest that we still desire connection with nonhuman others, and this desire emerges as accultured nature; we keep pets, we value views out across the land and sea, we cultivate gardens. It emerges as vicarious care, we watch nature documentaries and YouTube videos of funny cats and heart rendering animal rescues.

How might we, speculatively or pragmatically, reimaging dwelling as continuous with a complex web of biota?


Contextual background

This research project is informed from and sets out to test, interrogate and build upon the speculations of some key thinkers:

Object-Oriented Ontologist Timothy Morton[§]; in particular his thinking on the symbiotic real, solidarity with nonhuman people and of collectivity[**] as active and uneasy cohabitation. In particular I recommend  Timothy Morton in Conversation with Verso Books sections ‘the individual and the collective’ and ‘the ontological is political’ at time point 9:40 – 15:45

Science Studies writer/philosopher Bruno Latour articulation of the third place[††]which he articulates in  Why Gaia Is Not the Globe, 2016,

Nature/culture writer Michael Pollan on nonhuman agency and taking a non-anthropocentric view of evolution and symbiosis.

Donna Haraway, feminist, science and technology scholar and storyteller, in particular, the tentacular complexity Haraway acknowledges in making-do with nonhumans[‡‡].SF: String Figures, Multispecies Muddles, Staying with the Trouble. In the four minute section from 20:00 – 24:40min Haraway talks through her process of thinking with other thinkers, highlighting the importance of how we think and what platforms we think from. It is this self-reflexive mode of thought that I hope to foster in Conversation Pit.

Levi R Bryant, philosopher, Lacanian Psychoanalyst and champion of all things ontic. A formative thinker in defining the field of Object Oriented Ontology, currently researching a line of object-oriented thought, called which he terms ‘onticology’

I welcome your suggestion of thinkers and resources to add to the mix to expand and complicate the discussion.

[*] SCI-Arc Channel, ‘B. Arch Program Chair Tom Wiscombe Interviews Timothy Morton’, accessed 26 April 2018,  (section 1:03 – 1:45)

[†] The term Anthropocene was coined by atmospheric Chemist Paul J. Crutzen and currently under review by the International Union of Geological Sciences as the geological age in which the most profound influence for the change has been human activity.

[‡] In which Humans are separate from the Nature, a construction in which the natural world exists over yonder, providing both resource and backdrop for human activities.

[§] Morton, Timothy, Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People (London. New York: Verso Books, 2017).

[**] Verso Books, ‘Timothy Morton in Conversation with Verso Books’, accessed 26 April 2018, .

[††] Faculty of Arts, Aarhus Universitet, Bruno Latour: Why Gaia Is Not the Globe, 2016,

[‡‡] Donna Jeanne Haraway, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Experimental Futures Technological Lives, Scientific Arts, Anthropological Voices (Durham London: Duke University Press, 2016).

David Cooper, Claudia Dunes, Rainer Weston & James Wylie: Sometime, someday, when all is said and done

Sometime, someday, when all is said and done, a group show with David Cooper, Claudia Dunes, Rainer Weston & James Wylie.
March 6- March 23rd 2019.

That thing which you have seen and know intimately. Which helped form a part of your understanding of how things work. Despite the fact that you are aware it’s just a fabrication and not real, it’s still here – there’s just no linearity or narrative to it. The work is earnest, it just feels a little more cynical. You know how it ends. But it doesn’t. Ah! Un effomdement d’egos!

Sometime, someday, when all is said and done is a group exhibition of video, sculpture and painting. A sequel of sorts to the artist’s recent group exhibition ‘fine moon, poor tuning’ at Wellington’s Meanwhile gallery last July.

Erena Shingade
The Apocalypse Party of the Rich
Text in response to the exhibition, download here

The Cost Of Living

The Cost of Living
RM Fundraiser
Thursday 6th December 6-8pm

All works $100
RM is pleased to invite you to our 2018 fundraiser, The Cost of Living.

Over 70 artists have donated work to be sold for $100, with all proceeds going to support RM’s 2019 programme of exhibitions, events and screenings. The Cost of Living features many artists previously involved with RM, as well as artists we’d love to see exhibiting in the future.

In the spirit of a salon exhibition, no names will be displayed. The artist’s name will be revealed to the buyer upon sale of the work.

Established in 1997, RM is the country’s longest running artist-run-space. We seek to provide opportunities for artists and art writers, offering a platform for experimental projects and discourse.

As a space run only by volunteers, the support of our community has been essential to our survival, and we have been absolutely overwhelmed by the response of artists who have generously donated work.

This event has been kindly sponsored by Epic Beer.

Ngā mihi nui,
The RM collective

FEATURING:
Judith Lawson
Matt Dowman
Fiona Jack
Daegan Wells
Rachel Manning
Fu-On Chung
Nick Spratt
Xin Cheng & Chris Berthelsen
Becky Richards
David Cooper
Gabi Lardies
Karen Rubado
Larissa Goodwin
Priya Patel
Grant Priest
Finn Ferrier
Adam Ben-Dror
Deborah Rundle
Jess Hemmings
Lucy Meyle
Joe Jowitt
Joe Prisk
Harriet Stockman
Suburban Floral Association (Tanya Eccleston & Monique Redmond)
Ophelia Mikkelson
Philippa Emery
Public Share
Ryder Jones
Alex Plumb
Mark Schroder
Sonya Lacey
Kirsten Dryburgh
Yolunda Hickman
Amy Unkovich
Arielle Walker
Wai Ching Chan
Claudia Dunes
Heidi Brickell
Huni Mancini
Mordo Barkley
Rainer Weston
Sophie Bannan
Sophie Guilford-Smith
Tanya Martusheff
Tom Tuke
Britti Absolum
Daphne Simons
Cushla Donaldson
Kirsty McNeil
Jill Sorenson
Shi Xu
Karl Bayly
Caroline Faigan
Emil McAvoy
Evan Woodruffe
Jon Kennedy
Kate van der Drift
Mark Harvey
Monique Lacey
Sarah Callesen
Sarah Smuts Kennedy
Daniel Sanders
George Haijan
Melissa Laing
Anoushka Akel
Christina Pataialii
Ducklingmonster
Emma McIntyre
Judy Darragh
Krystina Kaza
Sholto Buck
Uniform Art Collective
Vivienne Worn
Ena Kosovac
Hannah Valentine
Rebecca Steedman
Sarah Mohawk
Shelley Simpson
Ayesha Green
Theo McDonald & Isabella Dampney

RM Gallery and Project Space
Hours
Thursday and Friday 1pm - 5pm
Saturday 12pm - 4pm

Samoa House Lane
Auckland Central 1010

We are located in the centre of Auckland, close to Karangahape Road. We are on Samoa House Lane, just off of Beresford Street -- look out for the incredible fale of Samoa House and you're nearly there.
We are  2 minutes walk from Artspace, Ivan Anthony and Michael Lett.

Safe Space Alliance

RM is a member of Safe Space Alliance

A safe space is a space where the LGBTQI+ community can freely express themselves without fear. It is a space that does not tolerate violence, bullying, or hate speech towards the LGBTQI+ community.

A safe space does not guarantee 100% safety, rather, it’s a space that has your back if an incident (violence, bullying, or hate speech) were to occur.

Click here to find out more about Safe Space Alliance

The RM Archive Project

Help us identify what is in our Archive! We have digitised many slides in our archive and invite participation to identify them. Please click here to access the collection.
https://www.rm.org.nz/thearchiverm

Our Boxed Archive
Since 2009 RM has been building an archive of material related to our exhibition and event programme. An index to the collection is available here.
https://www.rm.org.nz/thearchiverm/artist-boxes-index/

Subscribe to the RM mailing list